Menu
GGA DIAGNOSTIC

Dispute Management Assessment

Last reviewed: 8 September 2026

Assessment questionHow quickly are deductions, claims and disputes identified, owned and resolved?

Disputes become expensive when they sit between functions. The customer may call it a pricing issue, sales may call it a deduction, operations may wait for proof, and finance may continue to age the invoice without a resolution path.

Separate the dispute from the undisputed cash

For each material case, identify the invoice value, amount genuinely disputed, amount not disputed, date first raised, evidence requested, owner and next decision. This prevents a small issue from freezing an entire receivable.

Classify by resolution mechanism

Commercial

Pricing, rebate, discount, scheme or contract interpretation issues usually need a documented commercial decision, not repeated collection calls.

Performance

Short supply, service deficiency, quality or milestone disputes require proof of delivery, acceptance, rectification or agreed adjustment.

Administrative

Tax, portal, purchase-order, invoice format and document mismatches should have short operational closure paths with clear evidence.

Measure ageing of the issue itself

Invoice ageing alone hides whether the dispute is moving. Track days since the last substantive action, pending evidence, decision owner and promised closure date. A case that is old but actively progressing is different from one that has been untouched for six weeks.

Bottom line

The objective is to turn “customer dispute” from a catch-all status into a controlled case with a defined amount, cause, evidence owner and resolution event. Collections should continue on the portion that is not genuinely in dispute.