Menu
GGA DIAGNOSTIC

Counterparty Risk Assessment

Last reviewed: 8 September 2026

Assessment questionWhat should management independently know about the counterparty and exposure?

Counterparty risk is not a score in isolation. The assessment combines what the buyer is, how the relationship behaves, what the exposure could become and how quickly GGA would know if conditions deteriorated.

Build the exposure picture first

Start with legal identity, group relationships, operating footprint and the exact entity that owes the money. Then connect that identity to credit terms, open orders, unpaid invoices, security, concentration and any dependency on one plant, project or government contract.

Read behaviour alongside external facts

Payment behaviour

Compare agreed terms with actual payment rhythm, broken promises, deductions and unexplained changes in remittance pattern.

Business signals

Consider management changes, litigation, shutdowns, restructuring, funding stress or unusual requests only when the source and relevance can be established.

Exposure trajectory

Measure what happens if current orders continue while older invoices remain unpaid. Risk can rise even when the overdue balance looks stable.

Decision, not dossier

The assessment should end with a commercial decision: continue normally, tighten terms, cap exposure, seek evidence or security, pause supply, or escalate an existing receivable. The reasoning and unresolved facts should be visible so management knows what would change that decision.

Bottom line

The purpose is not to collect more background information. It is to know whether the current and prospective exposure is justified by verified facts and observed behaviour—and what control should change before the next invoice is raised.